Into WordPress
Move from a supported legacy, hosted, content, commerce or custom platform into WordPress.
WordPress Migration & Replatforming
Move from a supported legacy, hosted, content, commerce or custom platform into WordPress.
Move, combine or separate WordPress sites, builders, multisite structures, hosting environments or architectures.
Move from WordPress to a supported better-fit platform when evidence supports the change.
Move in phases, support coexistence or retain WordPress as one component of the target architecture.
Migration is a good fit when the business outcome and direction are understood well enough to scope discovery, dependencies, rehearsals, validation, cutover, rollback, coexistence and handover across the agreed source and destination.
Start with a Decision Roadmap when the target platform or migrate-versus-modernize decision is unsettled, a Technical Audit when technical uncertainty blocks the decision, or Update Recovery when the immediate need is stabilization rather than migration.
| Owner | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| PathToProject | Lead discovery, inventory and dependency mapping; agree transformation rules; build tooling or a pipeline where scoped; rehearse, reconcile, validate, plan cutover/rollback, support release and prepare handover. |
| Client | Identify owners and approvers, provide authorized access and accurate rules, decide content/data ownership and acceptance, coordinate vendors, approve windows and rollback conditions, and accept documented residual exceptions. |
| Third-party dependencies | Source and target platforms, hosting providers, registrars, software vendors, integration owners and payment providers may control access, export capability, rate limits, licensing, downtime and support response. |
Submitting Email and Website URL starts fit, discovery, access and dependency review; final scope follows that review. Content rewriting, data cleanup, new functionality, unsupported source/target capability, third-party fees, indefinite coexistence and post-release Maintenance remain separate unless explicitly scoped. An enterprise programme in the $50,000–250,000+ USD range is a separately scoped planning range, not a Govern Roadmap fee, fixed quotation or universal commitment.
A Decision Roadmap fee is separate when the migration direction or target platform is not yet decided. The published enterprise price range is not a minimum price for every migration.
Typical price range
From $2,500 USD
$3,000–10,000 USD
Confirmed after discovery
A bounded site or content-and-data move with understood access and dependencies.
Custom scoped
From $15,000 USD or custom scoped
Programme timing is scoped
More complex data, integrations, custom functionality, coexistence or cutover constraints.
Enterprise price range · Custom scoped
$50,000–250,000+ USD
Discovery-led programme
Multi-site, multi-brand or platform-consolidation programmes requiring discovery and staged migration.
Websites, content, media, users, roles, taxonomies, commerce data, configuration, custom functionality, integrations, web addresses and redirects.
When the agreed migration changes the platform, templates, data layer, consent implementation or connected systems, we can inventory, map and revalidate current approved measurement. This may include data-layer events, consent signals, Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Google Ads, other approved advertising tags, lead and ecommerce events, and Customer Data Platform connections when they exist in the current stack and are in scope.
Website, content, commerce and approved customer data move only where source access, target capability, consent, retention, privacy requirements and the agreed scope allow it. Revalidation means checking agreed critical journeys around cutover—not promising perfect attribution or complete historical recovery.
Event-taxonomy redesign, data-layer cleanup, attribution improvements, new destinations, audience design, historical-data work and broader Customer Data Platform work require separate discovery and scope. They are not default migration deliverables.
Revalidated means agreeing the relevant current behaviour, mapping it to the target environment and checking agreed critical journeys around cutover. It does not promise perfect attribution, complete historical recovery or universal platform compatibility. Bring the current measurement stack, owners, access availability, critical conversion journeys, consent and privacy requirements, target constraints and acceptance criteria; never send credentials through the website form.
WordPress Modernization remains WordPress-centered. If the target architecture is mainly Drupal, headless/composable or another supported platform, implementation may route to the appropriate PathToProject service line while WordPress assessment and source-side preparation remain in scope.
More than 55 independent websites were consolidated into a centralized WordPress multisite with standardized workflows. The published case does not identify every source platform.
Two WordPress and two Drupal sites were consolidated into one Drupal Digital Experience Platform using repeatable pipelines, mapping, iterative validation and phased cutover.
Share the source, intended destination, business outcome and the constraints that make a safe cutover possible.
These cases broaden the migration evidence without implying that every source and destination combination is automatically supported.
Migration experience involving WordPress
Several WordPress instances, Drupal and embedded PHP were consolidated into a centralized platform with iterative modernization and regression-tested releases.
Cross-platform experience
A staged path stabilized a legacy estate before moving to a modern platform and unified measurement foundation.
Both project associations are confirmed by the original project records. The recommendations support delivery quality; migration scope and results remain supported by the related cases.
Andrei Melis
Technical Lead at Eau de Web
A true full-stack developer: the ideal mix of DevOps expertise, deep front-end knowledge, and structured senior back-end thinking. He understands what needs to be done before being asked.
LinkedIn recommendation, used with permission (opens in a new tab)
Olivier Ritlewski
Ingénieur Logiciel chez EPAM Systems
Comfortable with Agile delivery and strong technically, he challenges stories and features in the right way to clarify specifications before and during sprints.
LinkedIn recommendation, used with permission (opens in a new tab)
Yes, subject to discovery, access and technical feasibility. WordPress may be the destination, source or retained component of a selective or hybrid architecture.
Content, media, users, roles, taxonomies, commerce data, configuration, custom functionality, integrations, web addresses and redirects may be included when the source and target support them.
The plan defines rehearsals or repeatable pipelines, validation, an agreed cutover window, rollback conditions, coexistence and legacy-system retirement.
Free public WordPress assessment
Start with the free WordPress Scan. It reviews publicly observable WordPress, response, delivery, maintenance and search signals, then gives you a bounded modernization assessment and a clearer next step. No admin access is required.
The Scan does not confirm private technical root causes. If the report surfaces a signal that matters and you are unsure what to do next, ask us to help interpret the evidence.