Audit or Decision Roadmap
Begin with evidence and an approved sequence when the technical cause or business path is not yet clear.
WordPress Modernization Delivery
Begin with evidence and an approved sequence when the technical cause or business path is not yet clear.
Bring an existing documented scope when outcomes, dependencies and acceptance criteria are defined well enough for delivery review.
An approved Decision Roadmap or a clear implementation scope is a good fit when the desired outcome, dependencies, critical workflows, approval authority and acceptance boundaries are understood well enough for delivery review.
Start with a Technical Audit when the technical cause is uncertain, a Decision Roadmap when the business has not chosen what to preserve or change, Update Recovery for an active incident, or Maintenance after a stable baseline exists.
| Owner | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| PathToProject | Confirm the delivery boundary, assumptions, exclusions, dependencies and acceptance; prepare the change and rollback path; implement bounded phases; validate the agreed outcome; and prepare handover. |
| Client | Provide timely access and factual inputs, identify authorized approvers and workflow owners, coordinate content/data decisions, review changes, and approve acceptance and release. |
| Third-party vendors | Hosting, SaaS platforms, licences, external vendors, payment providers and advertising platforms retain their own access, terms, availability and separately agreed costs. |
Submitting Email and Website URL starts a fit, scope, access and dependency review. It is not payment, a contract or an automatic implementation commitment. Delivery excludes a Technical Audit, Decision Roadmap, ongoing Maintenance, emergency response, unapproved scope and third-party costs unless an explicit proposal includes them.
These are typical implementation price ranges. Technical Audit and Decision Roadmap fees remain separate when those deliverables are needed first. Review illustrative Delivery acceptance and handover.
Typical price range
From $3,000 USD
Confirmed after scope review
A bounded first implementation phase with an agreed outcome and acceptance boundary.
Typical price range
$5,000–15,000 USD
Phased to the approved outcome
A defined modernization outcome delivered against explicit dependencies, assumptions and acceptance.
Custom scoped
From $20,000 USD or custom scoped
Programme timing is scoped
Several workstreams, sites, environments or unusually complex dependencies.
Stabilization, remediation, refactoring, upgrades, themes, components, content architecture and editor experience.
Performance, security, accessibility, reliability, testing, Linux / Server Administration and release systems.
WordPress-centered migration, multisite, customer data, campaign tracking and business-system integrations.
Agreed critical workflows pass; in-scope content and data are reconciled; required quality checks are recorded; deployment and rollback are documented; unresolved risks remain visible.
A Decision Roadmap does not change according to the chosen delivery partner. Clients may use an internal team, an existing agency, another qualified partner or request a separate PathToProject proposal.
Share the approved outcome or existing scope, the acceptance boundary and the critical workflows delivery must protect.
WordPress project
Direct WordPress evidence for multi-site consolidation, reusable architecture, standardized workflows and measured performance improvement.
Migration experience involving WordPress
WordPress-involved proof for repeatable migration pipelines, iterative validation and phased cutover.
Cross-platform experience
Transferable evidence for accountable multi-market delivery across platform, integration, data and measurement workstreams.
Amy Sacchetta
Lead User Experience / User Interface Designer
On large-scale projects requiring close collaboration, attention to detail, and efficient execution, he consistently went above and beyond to ensure the final outcome exceeded expectations.
LinkedIn recommendation, used with permission (opens in a new tab)
Ali Kazemi
Web & Digital Manager at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
He helped revive and complete a stalled CMS upgrade project, while also improving site accessibility and functionality. He was knowledgeable, skilful, and easy to work with.
LinkedIn recommendation, used with permission (opens in a new tab)
Yes, if the outcome, dependencies, critical workflows and acceptance criteria are defined well enough for delivery review. Otherwise an Audit or Roadmap should come first.
They are documented before production work. New evidence or scope is reviewed explicitly rather than absorbed into an undefined promise.
Not by default. Handover, residual risk and separately scoped next work are documented. WordPress Maintenance & Support has its own baseline, recurring responsibilities and commercial terms; emergency coverage requires a separate explicit agreement.
Free public WordPress assessment
Start with the free WordPress Scan. It reviews publicly observable WordPress, response, delivery, maintenance and search signals, then gives you a bounded modernization assessment and a clearer next step. No admin access is required.
The Scan does not confirm private technical root causes. If the report surfaces a signal that matters and you are unsure what to do next, ask us to help interpret the evidence.